How is Sola Scriptura incoherent?

But if you read it through the filter of the traditions of a Trinity, you will miss it (like many miss Jesus telling Mary about Mary’s G-d being Jesus’s G-d). That is incoherent.

A Trinity was first mentioned as G-d, His Word and His Wisdom, by Theophilus of Antioch.

John 20:17] Jesus said to her, “Do not cling to Me, for I have not yet ascended to My Father; but go to My brethren and say to them, ‘I am ascending to My Father and your Father, and to My God and your God.’ ”

Democrat voters, why are you so naive, easy to manipulate, can't see a liar standing right in front of you and why won't you research your party? You will find they have a plan for all W. Nations and it's evil.

The New Testament identifies Jesus. Literally, spelling it out in Acts 3.

So, how does that affect the Athanasian Christian doctrine of the Trinity?

But it was not until the efforts to create a uniform Christianity at Nicaea that the concept became the accepted tradition, to create a universal (catholic) interpretation of the writings.

What are some signs he is deeply in love with you?

Later, Tertullian would lay the foundations of the Trinity.

Nuda scriptura is scripture alone. Sola scriptura looks at the writings and the traditions, with the writings (source of the traditions) having greater relevance.

Considering that the traditions stem from interpretations based off the writings, sola scriptura would be the means to test the coherency of the traditions.

Is it still wrong to spread misinformation even if it's only to troll people rather than harming them?

For example, Jesus has a God …